<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And We Wonder Why Some Girls Aren&#039;t Physically Active?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nicolemlavoi.com/muslim-girls/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nicolemlavoi.com/muslim-girls</link>
	<description>Nicole M. LaVoi, Ph.D.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:20:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrice</title>
		<link>http://www.nicolemlavoi.com/muslim-girls#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator>patrice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nicolemlavoi.com/?p=1819#comment-270</guid>
		<description>I forcefully agree with your main argument, but I just read on additional thing that made me tick...

The first sentence of the second paragraph is
- out of topic
- biased
- depicting categories of population as victims

When something is depicted as self-evident (or well documented, or accepted as certain, etc...), it is usually for lack of ability to deliver proof. There are only two exceptions to this:
- &quot;Cogito, ergo sum&quot; - Rene Descartes, founder of rationalism
- &quot;We hold these truths to be self-evident&quot; - US declaration of Independence

Other instances of self-evidence without logical proof behind them invariably hide judgemental statements... most of the time implying serious political statements. And don&#039;t get me started on guns in the US...
I&#039;d just say: beware those statements, they undermine credibility with discerning people.

Nonetheless, I do agree with your main point of conflict between sports and the tchador (muslim veil)...

Best regards,
P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forcefully agree with your main argument, but I just read on additional thing that made me tick&#8230;</p>
<p>The first sentence of the second paragraph is<br />
- out of topic<br />
- biased<br />
- depicting categories of population as victims</p>
<p>When something is depicted as self-evident (or well documented, or accepted as certain, etc&#8230;), it is usually for lack of ability to deliver proof. There are only two exceptions to this:<br />
- &#8220;Cogito, ergo sum&#8221; &#8211; Rene Descartes, founder of rationalism<br />
- &#8220;We hold these truths to be self-evident&#8221; &#8211; US declaration of Independence</p>
<p>Other instances of self-evidence without logical proof behind them invariably hide judgemental statements&#8230; most of the time implying serious political statements. And don&#8217;t get me started on guns in the US&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;d just say: beware those statements, they undermine credibility with discerning people.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, I do agree with your main point of conflict between sports and the tchador (muslim veil)&#8230;</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

